COST EFFECTIVE PECB ISO-IEC-27005-RISK-MANAGER DUMPS - LATEST ISO-IEC-27005-RISK-MANAGER EXAM TOPICS

Cost Effective PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dumps - Latest ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Topics

Cost Effective PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dumps - Latest ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Topics

Blog Article

Tags: Cost Effective ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dumps, Latest ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Topics, Valid ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Study Notes, Reliable ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Registration, ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Detailed Study Plan

So, when you get the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam dumps material for your PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager certification exam, you have to check whether they are providing you the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Practice Test or not. You must choose those who shall give you the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager questions and not those who are giving you copied sheets only.

PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Fundamental Principles and Concepts of Information Security Risk Management: This domain covers the essential ideas and core elements behind managing risks in information security, with a focus on identifying and mitigating potential threats to protect valuable data and IT resources.
Topic 2
  • Other Information Security Risk Assessment Methods: Beyond ISO
  • IEC 27005, this domain reviews alternative methods for assessing and managing risks, allowing organizations to select tools and frameworks that align best with their specific requirements and risk profile.
Topic 3
  • Information Security Risk Management Framework and Processes Based on ISO
  • IEC 27005: Centered around ISO
  • IEC 27005, this domain provides structured guidelines for managing information security risks, promoting a systematic and standardized approach aligned with international practices.
Topic 4
  • Implementation of an Information Security Risk Management Program: This domain discusses the steps for setting up and operationalizing a risk management program, including procedures to recognize, evaluate, and reduce security risks within an organization’s framework.

>> Cost Effective PECB ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dumps <<

Perfect Cost Effective ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Dumps - Easy and Guaranteed ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Success

It is acknowledged that there are numerous ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager learning questions for candidates for the exam, however, it is impossible for you to summarize all of the key points in so many materials by yourself. But since you have clicked into this website for ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice materials you need not to worry about that at all because our company is especially here for you to solve this problem. We have a lot of regular customers for a long-term cooperation now since they have understood how useful and effective our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Actual Exam is. So will you!

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27005 Risk Manager Sample Questions (Q23-Q28):

NEW QUESTION # 23
Which of the following risk assessment methods provides an information security risk assessment methodology and involves three phases build asset-based threat profiles, identify infrastructure vulnerabilities, and develop security strategy and plans?

  • A. TRA
  • B. MEHARI
  • C. OCTAVE-S

Answer: C

Explanation:
OCTAVE-S (Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation for Small Organizations) is a risk assessment methodology tailored for small organizations. It provides a structured approach for identifying and managing information security risks. The OCTAVE-S method involves three main phases:
Building asset-based threat profiles, where critical assets and their associated threats are identified.
Identifying infrastructure vulnerabilities by assessing the organization's technological infrastructure for weaknesses that could be exploited by threats.
Developing security strategy and plans to address the identified risks and improve the overall security posture.
The OCTAVE-S method aligns with the description provided in the question, making it the correct answer. MEHARI and TRA are other risk assessment methods, but they do not specifically follow the three phases outlined above.


NEW QUESTION # 24
Scenario 5: Detika is a private cardiology clinic in Pennsylvania, the US. Detika has one of the most advanced healthcare systems for treating heart diseases. The clinic uses sophisticated apparatus that detects heart diseases in early stages. Since 2010, medical information of Detika's patients is stored on the organization's digital systems. Electronic health records (EHR), among others, include patients' diagnosis, treatment plan, and laboratory results.
Storing and accessing patient and other medical data digitally was a huge and a risky step for Detik a. Considering the sensitivity of information stored in their systems, Detika conducts regular risk assessments to ensure that all information security risks are identified and managed. Last month, Detika conducted a risk assessment which was focused on the EHR system. During risk identification, the IT team found out that some employees were not updating the operating systems regularly. This could cause major problems such as a data breach or loss of software compatibility. In addition, the IT team tested the software and detected a flaw in one of the software modules used. Both issues were reported to the top management and they decided to implement appropriate controls for treating the identified risks. They decided to organize training sessions for all employees in order to make them aware of the importance of the system updates. In addition, the manager of the IT Department was appointed as the person responsible for ensuring that the software is regularly tested.
Another risk identified during the risk assessment was the risk of a potential ransomware attack. This risk was defined as low because all their data was backed up daily. The IT team decided to accept the actual risk of ransomware attacks and concluded that additional measures were not required. This decision was documented in the risk treatment plan and communicated to the risk owner. The risk owner approved the risk treatment plan and documented the risk assessment results.
Following that, Detika initiated the implementation of new controls. In addition, one of the employees of the IT Department was assigned the responsibility for monitoring the implementation process and ensure the effectiveness of the security controls. The IT team, on the other hand, was responsible for allocating the resources needed to effectively implement the new controls.
Based on scenario 5, the IT team was responsible for allocating the necessary resources to ensure that the new controls are implemented effectively. Is this acceptable?

  • A. No, the necessary resources for treating the risk should be allocated in the beginning of the risk assessment process
  • B. No, the organization should allocate the necessary resources to ensure the effective implementation of the risk treatment plan
  • C. Yes, the team that is responsible for conducting the risk assessment should ensure that the necessary resources for treating the risk are allocated

Answer: C

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the team responsible for the risk assessment is often tasked with coordinating the resources necessary to treat identified risks effectively. This includes ensuring that the resources required for implementing risk treatment actions, such as financial, technical, and human resources, are available and allocated appropriately. Option B is incorrect because it is not only the organization that allocates resources, but rather a combined effort involving the risk management team to ensure proper allocation. Option C is incorrect because resources must be managed and allocated continually throughout the risk management process, not just at the beginning.


NEW QUESTION # 25
Scenario 3: Printary is an American company that offers digital printing services. Creating cost-effective and creative products, the company has been part of the printing industry for more than 30 years. Three years ago, the company started to operate online, providing greater flexibility for its clients. Through the website, clients could find information about all services offered by Printary and order personalized products. However, operating online increased the risk of cyber threats, consequently, impacting the business functions of the company. Thus, along with the decision of creating an online business, the company focused on managing information security risks. Their risk management program was established based on ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines and industry best practices.
Last year, the company considered the integration of an online payment system on its website in order to provide more flexibility and transparency to customers. Printary analyzed various available solutions and selected Pay0, a payment processing solution that allows any company to easily collect payments on their website. Before making the decision, Printary conducted a risk assessment to identify and analyze information security risks associated with the software. The risk assessment process involved three phases: identification, analysis, and evaluation. During risk identification, the company inspected assets, threats, and vulnerabilities. In addition, to identify the information security risks, Printary used a list of the identified events that could negatively affect the achievement of information security objectives. The risk identification phase highlighted two main threats associated with the online payment system: error in use and data corruption After conducting a gap analysis, the company concluded that the existing security controls were sufficient to mitigate the threat of data corruption. However, the user interface of the payment solution was complicated, which could increase the risk associated with user errors, and, as a result, impact data integrity and confidentiality.
Subsequently, the risk identification results were analyzed. The company conducted risk analysis in order to understand the nature of the identified risks. They decided to use a quantitative risk analysis methodology because it would provide more detailed information. The selected risk analysis methodology was consistent with the risk evaluation criteri a. Firstly, they used a list of potential incident scenarios to assess their potential impact. In addition, the likelihood of incident scenarios was defined and assessed. Finally, the level of risk was defined as low.
In the end, the level of risk was compared to the risk evaluation and acceptance criteria and was prioritized accordingly.
Based on scenario 3, Printary used a list of identified events that could negatively influence the achievement of its information security objectives to identify information security risks. Is this in compliance with the guidelines of ISO/IEC 27005?

  • A. Yes, a list of events that can negatively influence the achievement of information security objectives in the company should be used to identity information security risks
  • B. No. a list of risk sources, business processes. and business objectives should be used to identify information security risks
  • C. No, a list of risk scenarios with their consequences related to assets or events and their likelihood should be used to identity information security risks

Answer: A

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, identifying risks to information security involves recognizing events that could adversely affect the achievement of information security objectives. Using a list of events that could negatively impact these objectives is consistent with the risk identification process as outlined in ISO/IEC 27005. This approach focuses on identifying specific incidents or events that could result in security breaches or compromises, providing a clear understanding of the potential risks to the organization. Thus, Printary's use of a list of such events to identify information security risks complies with the standard's guidelines, making option B the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.2, "Risk Identification," which states that the organization should identify the events that could compromise information security objectives.


NEW QUESTION # 26
Scenario 8: Biotide is a pharmaceutical company that produces medication for treating different kinds of diseases. The company was founded in 1997, and since then it has contributed in solving some of the most challenging healthcare issues.
As a pharmaceutical company, Biotide operates in an environment associated with complex risks. As such, the company focuses on risk management strategies that ensure the effective management of risks to develop high-quality medication. With the large amount of sensitive information generated from the company, managing information security risks is certainly an important part of the overall risk management process. Biotide utilizes a publicly available methodology for conducting risk assessment related to information assets. This methodology helps Biotide to perform risk assessment by taking into account its objectives and mission. Following this method, the risk management process is organized into four activity areas, each of them involving a set of activities, as provided below.
1. Activity area 1: The organization determines the criteria against which the effects of a risk occurring can be evaluated. In addition, the impacts of risks are also defined.
2. Activity area 2: The purpose of the second activity area is to create information asset profiles. The organization identifies critical information assets, their owners, as well as the security requirements for those assets. After determining the security requirements, the organization prioritizes them. In addition, the organization identifies the systems that store, transmit, or process information.
3. Activity area 3: The organization identifies the areas of concern which initiates the risk identification process. In addition, the organization analyzes and determines the probability of the occurrence of possible threat scenarios.
4. Activity area 4: The organization identifies and evaluates the risks. In addition, the criteria specified in activity area 1 is reviewed and the consequences of the areas of concerns are evaluated. Lastly, the level of identified risks is determined.
The table below provides an example of how Biotide assesses the risks related to its information assets following this methodology:

Based on the table provided in scenario 8, did Biotide prioritize the security requirements for electronic health records?

  • A. Yes, Biotide prioritized the security requirements for electronic health records when prioritizing the areas of concern
  • B. Yes, Biotide determined confidentiality as the most important security requirement for electronic health records
  • C. No, Biotide did not prioritize security requirements for electronic health records

Answer: B

Explanation:
Based on the table provided in Scenario 8, Biotide has prioritized the security requirements for its electronic health records. In Activity Area 2, the table clearly indicates that confidentiality is considered the most important security feature for electronic health records. This prioritization is based on the need to ensure that only authorized users have access to these critical information assets due to the sensitive nature of the data involved.
The emphasis on confidentiality aligns with ISO/IEC 27005 guidelines, which recommend prioritizing security requirements based on the impact assessment and the organization's risk management objectives. In this case, the potential impact of unauthorized access (breach of confidentiality) to electronic health records is high, which justifies Biotide's decision to prioritize confidentiality over other security requirements such as integrity or availability.
Option A is correct because it reflects the prioritization decision documented in the table, while options B and C are inaccurate as they either misrepresent the prioritization process or suggest that it did not occur.


NEW QUESTION # 27
Scenario 5: Detika is a private cardiology clinic in Pennsylvania, the US. Detika has one of the most advanced healthcare systems for treating heart diseases. The clinic uses sophisticated apparatus that detects heart diseases in early stages. Since 2010, medical information of Detika's patients is stored on the organization's digital systems. Electronic health records (EHR), among others, include patients' diagnosis, treatment plan, and laboratory results.
Storing and accessing patient and other medical data digitally was a huge and a risky step for Detik a. Considering the sensitivity of information stored in their systems, Detika conducts regular risk assessments to ensure that all information security risks are identified and managed. Last month, Detika conducted a risk assessment which was focused on the EHR system. During risk identification, the IT team found out that some employees were not updating the operating systems regularly. This could cause major problems such as a data breach or loss of software compatibility. In addition, the IT team tested the software and detected a flaw in one of the software modules used. Both issues were reported to the top management and they decided to implement appropriate controls for treating the identified risks. They decided to organize training sessions for all employees in order to make them aware of the importance of the system updates. In addition, the manager of the IT Department was appointed as the person responsible for ensuring that the software is regularly tested.
Another risk identified during the risk assessment was the risk of a potential ransomware attack. This risk was defined as low because all their data was backed up daily. The IT team decided to accept the actual risk of ransomware attacks and concluded that additional measures were not required. This decision was documented in the risk treatment plan and communicated to the risk owner. The risk owner approved the risk treatment plan and documented the risk assessment results.
Following that, Detika initiated the implementation of new controls. In addition, one of the employees of the IT Department was assigned the responsibility for monitoring the implementation process and ensure the effectiveness of the security controls. The IT team, on the other hand, was responsible for allocating the resources needed to effectively implement the new controls.
Based on scenario 5, the decision to accept the risk of a potential ransomware attack was approved by the risk owner. Is this acceptable?

  • A. No, the risk treatment plan should be approved by the top management and implemented by risk owners
  • B. Yes, the risk treatment plan should be approved by the risk owners
  • C. No, all interested parties should approve the risk treatment plan

Answer: B

Explanation:
According to ISO/IEC 27005, the risk treatment plan should be approved by the risk owners, who are the individuals or entities responsible for managing specific risks. In the scenario, the risk owner approved the decision to accept the risk of a potential ransomware attack and documented it in the risk treatment plan. This is consistent with the guidelines, which state that risk owners are responsible for deciding on risk treatment and approving the associated plans. Thus, option C is the correct answer.
Reference:
ISO/IEC 27005:2018, Clause 8.6, "Risk Treatment," which emphasizes that risk treatment plans should be approved by the risk owners.


NEW QUESTION # 28
......

With our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager practice materials, you don't need to spend a lot of time and effort on reviewing and preparing. For everyone, time is precious. Office workers and mothers are very busy at work and home; students may have studies or other things. Using ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager guide torrent, you only need to spend a small amount of time to master the core key knowledge to pass the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam and get a ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Managercertificate. It is proved that if you spend 20 to 30 hours to study our ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam questions, it is easy for you to pass the ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager exam.

Latest ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager Exam Topics: https://www.validdumps.top/ISO-IEC-27005-Risk-Manager-exam-torrent.html

Report this page